Posts Tagged ‘Nike Free’

The Great Running Shoe Hunt, Part 2

June 6, 2010

My great shoe hunt may be over. Saturday a pair of Inov-8 Flyroc 310s arrived in the mail from Colorado Running Company in Colorado Springs.

Now let’s back up. When I last wrote about shoes I had been having footproblems since Nike changed its Pegasus model. I went through a pair of Nike Skylons, then a pair of New Balance TR 904, which I initially liked but then began to develop pain in the top of the foot. My feet felt pretty tortured after the 30-mile World Championship Pack-Burro Race. But the final straw was the following week when the bottom forefoot of one these shoes peeled loose somewhere on the way back down Mosquito Pass during the Leadville Boom Days Pack-Burro Race

By then I was not in the mood to buy any more new shoes, and this was only reinforced after reading Christopher McDougall’s “Born to Run” over the winter. Sometime last fall I bought a pair of Land’s End Trail Runners, and for $38 they actually weren’t the worst shoes I’ve ever run in. At least they were gimmick-free and fairly low-profile. Somehow throughout the winter and spring I put in my workouts rotating these shoes with a pair of Nike Lunarglide Avants, which I destroyed in short order, and an old, old pair of Nike Free Trail 5.0s.

I even put in a couple of two-hour runs in the Frees. I’ve also been doing some barefoot therapy after some workouts, and have done some running and walking in my Crocs.

All the while I’ve been researching shoes. I even spent a few hours in some shoe stores. The thing that annoys me most is the discrepancy in sizing. I had my foot measured on Brannock Devices in two different stores. Both times it was agreed that I am just under a size 11. Still, I knew better and had one shoe-store salesperson bring out a pair of Nike Free Runs in size 12. I couldn’t even get my foot into the shoe. I asked for a size 13 and they didn’t have it in that size. I tried on a pair of Nike Lunarglides and decided that I needed a 13 in this shoe as well.

Why can’t shoe companies make shoes to standardized sizing? It seems like this is even more important in the age of Internet shopping.

Figuring that I’d take advantage of my discount at Roadrunner Sports, I decided to order a pair of Lunarglides from them. My wife also wanted a pair. They arrived. We tried them on. We looked at each other and suddenly realized how tall they are. We boxed them back up. I sent them back.

That was when I contacted John O’Neill at Colorado Running Company. The store carries the Inov-8 line and after some discussion I decided to order the Flyrocs in size 12. These shoes are low profile, flexible, and so far seem to be good. I spent three hours running and hiking in them yesterday. I wish I’d ordered them in size 12.5, but for now at least I have something I can apparently run in.

Another taste of defeet

July 6, 2009

“Feet” seems to be a major search term that brings people this site. There’s tremendous interest in the notion of running closer to barefoot, and the potential damage caused by many of the overbuilt running shoes on the market today. 


Earlier this year I wrote about some issues I’ve had with running shoes and my attempts to get closer to a natural stride. It all started when Nike made changes to its Pegasus model. I have since been running in an old pair of Pegasus and rotating them with an old pair of Nike Free 5.0 and the new Nike Zoom Skylon.

The new version of the Pegasus left me with a painful talus joint in the medial ankle/foot. I recently had this worked on by Dr. Scott Cuthbert in Pueblo. He’s performed a couple of miracle healings on me in the past and I recommend him for anyone seeking a holistic approach to their health. After treatment by Dr. Scott, muscle testing showed I was fairly strong in the Zoom Skylon. In the meantime, upon recommendation of John O’Neill of Colorado Running Company, I ordered a pair of New Balance 904 TR.

I’ve now run three days in these new shoes and I really like them. The foot actually rests way lower in these than a side view would indicate. They are lightweight and flexible but offer just the little bit more protection that I need for running over rough terrain. And, most importantly, my gait feels fairly natural in these shoes. New Balance also offers the 904 in a street model.

The only thing I really hate about these shoes is the disco color scheme. Who comes up with this stuff? Whatever, I’d probably wear shoes in fluorescent pink if my feet felt good in them.

Footloose in the Nike Free

March 21, 2009

feetYou’d think after 30 years of running (I started in 1979 and ran my first marathon in 1980) I’d have some sort of clue about running shoes. But feet, bodies and training styles do change over the years. And, unfortunately, so do shoe models.

For many of those 30 years I’ve been able to trust the Nike Pegasus models (even pre “Air”). But I’ve also had success with a number of other shoes. I won the Pueblo River Trail Marathon in 1984 in a pair of Brooks Chariots. And I won several World Championship Pack-Burro races in Montrail’s Vitesse. I had a sponsorship from that company for a few years, but the Vitesse became difficult to get, even for sponsored athletes (it now appears Montrail may have discontinued the model — I can’t find it on the website), and so I had to change shoes.

In recent years I had gone back to the Pegasus and, aside from some minor pain on the top of my right foot, everything had been pretty good until Nike decided to change the model this year. I bought a new pair a few weeks ago and my feet and ankles hurt after just a couple of runs. I decided to return the shoes.

The only running shoes in my closet that didn’t look like they’d been through a meat grinder were an old pair of Nike Free. These shoes were designed allow the feet to act as if they are barefoot, and I’d run in them periodically. Recently I’ve been editing Dr. Phil Maffetone’s 5th edition of “In Fitness and In Health” and he’s a big advocate of barefoot running. I thought, “what the heck,” and started running in the Frees daily. They are very flexible, low to the ground and have basically no support or cushioning whatsoever — sort of like wearing slippers.

Most modern running shoes force you to land on your heels, which is natural for walking but not for running. Try running barefoot on some grass or sand and you will find it virtually impossible to land on your heels. The natural way to land is mid-foot. In the Frees I found my footstrike to be very natural.

There was some adjustment as my feet, ankles and all associated tendons and muscles had to remember to do their actual jobs. But after about three weeks I felt comfortable using the Frees as my daily training shoes. I’ve been getting in 35-45 miles per week, and I’m not running on pavement, but rather on gravel roads, rocky trails, through snowbanks and mud, and on generally hilly terrain, often leading or driving a pack-burro.

Because of this mountain environment, I still felt like I might need more shoe. So after perusing the catalogs I settled on returning the aforementioned Pegasus (there was a 60-day return policy) and trading them for a pair of Nike Air Zoom Skylon +2, which looked a little like the Free on steroids. The shoes arrived this week and after just three runs I was practically crippled with pain in both forefeet.

A closer inspection of my feet revealed that their shape had actually changed over the past three weeks in the Frees. They now were shaped like, uh, feet. Not shoes.

I went back to the Frees today and felt immediately better on a 7-mile run. I’m sending the Skylons back.