Meat production and greenhouse gases

The Environmental Protection Agency has proposed a tax on cattle and hogs that officials say contribute to carbon emissions. Annual fees could range as high as $87.50 per head for beef cattle.

Ranchers say it could put them out of business. Supporters say it would force ranchers to switch to “healthier crops.”bull

This argument is the same gross overgeneralization often put forth by the vegetarian crowd — that all meat production contributes significantly to greenhouse gas emissions and that people are healthier eating a grain-based diet.

While the greenhouse gas assertion may be true for animals fed grain in feedlots and factory farms, the opposite is actually true for animals raised on pasture. In fact, animals raised on pasture rather than on grain actually can help reduce carbon buildup. Management intensive grazing or holistic pasture management actually promotes the growth of oxygen-producing plants — grasses and other forage — while reducing the amount of gases produced by the animals themselves. Grasslands also may be more effective than trees at removing carbon emissions from the air.

In addition, pasture-based agriculture eliminates the fossil-fuel intensive production of cereal grains, which must be planted, fertilized, cultivated, treated with pesticides, harvested and transported. Grain farming is a leading cause of death of songbirds, and the overconsumption of cereal grains by humans is a major contributor to many chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease, diabetes and cancer.

Scientific research has shown the health risks associated with vegetarianism. Meat from grassfed animals is a much healthier choice, with a fat profile closer to that of wild game animals that humans have eaten throughout evolution.

It would make more sense for the EPA to tax cattle producers that use the grain-fed feedlot approach while giving a tax break to ranchers who are raising animals on pasture and using holistic grazing practices. While we’re at it, why not cut out subsidies for and heavily tax the big producers of corn and other grains that are at the root of so many environmental and health problems.


Bumper sticker of the month: Religion is for people who are scared of going to Hell. Spirituality is for people who have already been there.

3 thoughts on “Meat production and greenhouse gases

  1. You’re right about the fact that cattle in good grazing management can actuallly be beneficial to the grass. If anyone should be taxed, it’s the owners of CAFOs (concentrated animal feeding operations) who are legitimately polluting the environment. I know ranchers who are actually receiving carbon credits for their grazing.
    Check out our website

  2. I’ll restate what you said: Grass fed beef is virtually as good for you as wild game meat.

    Feedlot beef is not good for you because: It’s full of growth hormones, antibiotics, and due to their cereal diet the fats are unhealthy.

    Eat more grass fed beef! Shop locally for quality grass fed meats.

  3. My favorite bumper sticker of all time, if only because it took some actual work on the part of the bumper’s owner, beyond simply peeling off the backing.

    It seemed to be three separate bumper stickers, with selected lines trimmed and rearranged to form a more elaborate thought, with the help of a Sharpie along the way.

    God is not a Republican, nor is He a Democrat.
    She’s a Libertarian
    And She wants you to stay off of my lawn.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s